Tuesday, August 7, 2012

A Poem About Plurals

I would like to thank my university professor for sharing this with myself and the rest of the class. It proves the point that while the English language is the most widely used and taught language around the world, most of the time it doesn't make the slightest bloody sense.

A Poem About Plurals

We'll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes;
but the plural of ox became oxen not oxes.
One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,
yet the plural of moose should never be meese.
You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice;
yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.
If the plural of man is always called men,
why shouldn't the plural of pan be called pen?
If I spoke of my foot and show you my feet,
and I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?
If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
why shouldn't the plural of booth be called beeth?
Then one may be that, and three would be those,
yet hat in the plural would never be hose,
and the plural of cat is cats, not cose.
We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
but though we say mother, we never say methren.
Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
but imagine the feminine, she, shis and shim. 


Respect to anyone and everyone who learns English as a second language. It's my first language and I can barely understand it. Probably explains why I am fluent in gibberish.

Just don't get me started on grammar . . .


No comments:

Post a Comment